Process for the production of electrolyte capacitors

ABSTRACT

The invention relates to a process for the production of electrolyte capacitors having a low equivalent series resistance and low residual current, electrolyte capacitors produced by this process and the use of such electrolyte capacitors.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Division of application Ser. No. 11/520,330 filed on Sep. 13, 2006 which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Application Ser. No. 11/520,330 claims benefit to German Application 10 2005 043 828 filed on Sep. 13, 2005 which is incorporated by reference in its entirety for all useful purposes.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of Invention

The invention relates to a process for the production of electrolyte capacitors having a low equivalent series resistance and low residual current, electrolyte capacitors produced by this process and the use of such electrolyte capacitors.

2. Description of Related Art

A commercially available solid electrolyte capacitor as a rule comprises a porous metal electrode, an oxide layer on the metal surface, an electrically conductive solid which is incorporated into the porous structure, an outer electrode (contacting), such as e.g. a silver layer, and further electrical contacts and an encapsulation.

Examples of solid electrolyte capacitors are tantalum, aluminium, niobium and niobium oxide capacitors with charge transfer complexes, or pyrolusite or polymer solid electrolytes. The use of porous bodies has the advantage that because of the high surface area a very high capacitance density, i.e. a high electrical capacitance over a small space, can be achieved.

π-Conjugated polymers are particularly suitable as solid electrolytes because of their high electrical conductivity. π-Conjugated polymers are also called conductive polymers or synthetic metals. They are increasingly gaining economic importance, since polymers have advantages over metals in respect of processability, weight and targeted adjustment of properties by chemical modification. Examples of known π-conjugated polymers are polypyrroles, polythiophenes, polyanilines, polyacetylenes, polyphenylenes and poly(p-phenylene-vinylenes), a particularly important polythiophene which is used industrially being poly-3,4-(ethylene-1,2-dioxy)thiophene, often also called poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene), since it has a very high conductivity in its oxidized form.

Technical development in electronics increasingly requires solid electrolyte capacitors having very low equivalent series resistances (ESR). Reasons for this are, for example, falling logic voltages, a higher integration density and increasing cycle frequencies in integrated circuits. Furthermore, a low ESR also lowers energy consumption, which is particularly advantageous for mobile battery-operated uses. There is therefore the desire to reduce the ESR of solid electrolyte capacitors to as low a value as possible.

European Patent Specification EP-A-340 512 describes the preparation of a solid electrolyte from 3,4-ethylene-1,2-dioxythiophene and the use of its cationic polymers, prepared by oxidative polymerization, as a solid electrolyte in electrolyte capacitors. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene), as a substitute for manganese dioxide or charge transfer complexes in solid electrolyte capacitors, lowers the equivalent series resistance of the capacitor due to the higher electrical conductivity, and improves the frequency properties.

A disadvantage of this and similar processes is that the conductive polymer is produced by polymerization in situ in the electrolyte capacitor. For this, the monomer, such as e.g. 3,4-ethylene-1,2-dioxythiophene, and oxidizing agent must be incorporated together or successively into the porous metal body in the presence of solvents and then polymerized. However, such a chemical reaction is undesirable in the production of electronic components, since it is very difficult to allow the chemical reaction to proceed always in an identical manner in millions of small porous components in order to produce capacitors of the same specification.

It is furthermore a disadvantage of in situ polymerization in the production of solid electrolytes for capacitors that the oxidizing agents can damage the dielectric (oxide layer) on the metal electrode. Transition metal salts, such as e.g. Fe(III) salts, are as a rule used as oxidizing agents. After the polymerization, not only the electrically conductive polymer but also the reduced metal salts, such as e.g. Fe(II) salts, remain in the electrode body as reaction products of the polymerization. An attempt can indeed be made to remove these salts by subsequent washing steps. However, this is expensive and is not achieved completely, i.e. residues of the metal salts still remain in the electrode body. As is known, transition metals in particular can damage the dielectric, so that the increased residual currents resulting from this significantly reduce the life of the capacitors or even render it impossible to use the capacitors under harsh conditions, such as high temperatures and/or high atmospheric humidity.

Furthermore, the production process for solid electrolyte capacitors is very expensive if an in situ polymerization is used: A polymerization process (impregnation, polymerization, washing) as a rules takes several hours, and under certain circumstances solvents which are an explosion hazard or toxic must be used in this, and very many polymerization processes are required in order to produce a solid electrolyte.

A further disadvantage of chemical in situ processes for the production of solid electrolyte capacitors is that as a rule anions of the oxidizing agent or optionally other monomeric anions serve as counter-ions for the conductive polymer. Because of their small size, however, these are not bonded to the polymer in a sufficiently stable manner. As a result, diffusion of the counter-ions and therefore an increase in the equivalent series resistance (ESR) of the capacitor may occur, especially at elevated use temperatures of the capacitor. The alternative use of high molecular weight polymeric counter-ions in the chemical in situ polymerization does not lead to films which are sufficiently conductive and therefore does not lead to low ESR values.

In Japanese Patent Application JP-A 2001-102255, a layer of polyethylenedioxythiophene/polystyrenesulfonic acid is applied directly to the oxide film for protection of the oxide film and better adhesion of the solid electrolyte to the oxide film. The solid electrolyte is then applied to this layer by means of in situ polymerization. However, this method also has the disadvantage that an in situ polymerization is necessary in order to produce a capacitor having a low ESR.

A polymerization of monomers can also be carried out electrochemically in the absence of oxidizing agents. However, the electrochemical polymerization requires that a conductive film is first deposited on the insulating oxide layer of the metal electrode. An in situ polymerization with all the abovementioned disadvantages is then in turn required for this. Finally, this layer must be electrically contacted for each individual metal electrode. This contacting is very expensive in mass production and can damage the oxide layer. Furthermore, electrochemical deposition into the pores of the porous metal electrode is very difficult, since the deposition primarily takes place on the outside of the electrode body due to the course of the electrical potential.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

There therefore continues to be a need for novel and simpler processes for the production of solid electrolyte capacitors having a low equivalent series resistance (ESR) and low residual current, in which no in situ polymerization is necessary, the dielectric is not damaged by metal ions and a solid electrolyte which is more stable to heat is formed.

The object was therefore to provide such a process and the capacitors improved by this means.

Because of better availability compared with tantalum, the economic interest in niobium capacitors and niobium oxide capacitors has risen significantly in the last year.

A disadvantage furthermore of chemical in situ processes for the production of the solid electrolyte is that no solid electrolyte capacitors which are based on an electrode material of niobium or niobium oxide and are distinguished by a low residual current can be produced with them.

There therefore continues to be a need for processes for the production of polymer solid electrolyte capacitors in which the electrode materials are based on niobium or niobium oxide and which have a low residual current and low ESR.

A further object was to provide such a process for the production of such polymer solid electrolyte capacitors in which the electrode materials are based on niobium or niobium oxide, and the corresponding capacitors.

It has now been found, surprisingly, that capacitors in which the solid electrolyte is produced with dispersions comprising particles of an electrically conductive polymer having an average diameter of 1-100 nm and a conductivity of greater than 10 S/cm meet these requirements.

The present invention therefore provides a process for the production of an electrolyte capacitor at least comprising the steps that

-   -   a) on to a porous body at least comprising     -   b) a porous electrode body (2) of an electrode material and a         dielectric (3) which covers the surface of this electrode         material,     -   c) is applied a dispersion A)     -   d) which comprises at least particles B) of an electrically         conductive polymer and a dispersing agent D),

and for the formation of a solid electrolyte (4) which completely or partly covers the dielectric surface, the dispersing agent D) is at least partly removed and/or cured,

characterized in that the particles B) of the conductive polymer in the dispersion A) have an average diameter of 1-100 nm and films produced from particles B) have a specific conductivity of greater than 10 S/cm.

The specific conductivity of the films produced from particles B) is the specific conductivity of the films in the dried state.

It is surprising that the particles B) must be smaller than 100 nm in order to penetrate into porous electrode bodies which have pore diameters larger than 500 nm and therefore 5 times larger than the particles B). It is furthermore surprising that such small particles B) form a sufficiently conductive film in the electrode body, since the resistance is dominated by the contact resistances between the particles and as a rule increases as the size of the particles decreases.

A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the structure of a solid electrolytic capacitor in the example of a tantalum capacitor.

FIG. 2 shows the enlarged detail 10 from FIG. 1 that reproduces the schematic layer structure of the tantalum capacitor.

A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a process for the producing an electrolyte capacitor which comprises

applying a dispersion A) on to a porous body

-   -   wherein said porous body comprises     -   a porous electrode body of an electrode material and a         dielectric which covers the surface of this electrode material,     -   wherein said dispersion A) comprises at least particles B) of an         electrically conductive polymer and a dispersing agent D), and         forming a solid electrolyte which completely or partly covers         the dielectric surface, and the dispersing agent D) is at least         partly removed and/or cured,     -   wherein the particles B) of the conductive polymer in the         dispersion A) have an average diameter of 1-100 nm, and films         produced from particles B) have a specific conductivity in the         dry state of greater than 10 S/cm.

The diameter of the particles B) is determined via an ultracentrifuge measurement. The general procedure is described in Colloid Polym. Sci. 267, 1113-1116 (1989). In the case of particles B) which swell in the dispersion, the particle size is determined in the swollen state. A diameter distribution of the particles B) relates to a weight distribution of the particles in the dispersion as a function of the particle diameter.

In the process, the particles B) of the conductive polymer in the dispersion A) preferably have an average diameter of from 1 to 80 nm, particularly preferably from 1 to 50 nm, very particularly preferably from 5 to 40 nm.

In the process, the particles B) of the conductive polymer in the dispersion A) preferably have a d₉₀ value of the diameter distribution of less than 150 nm, particularly preferably less than 100 nm, very particularly preferably less than 80 nm and extremely preferably less than 50 nm.

In the process, the particles B) of the conductive polymer in the dispersion A) preferably have a d₁₀ value of the diameter distribution of greater than 1 nm, particularly preferably greater than 3 nm, very particularly preferably greater than 5 nm.

In this context, the d₁₀ value of the diameter distribution states that 10% of the total weight of all the particles B) of the conductive polymer in the dispersion A) can be assigned to those particles B) which have a diameter of less than or equal to the d₁₀ value. The d₉₀ value of the diameter distribution states that 90% of the total weight of all the particles B) of the conductive polymer in the dispersion A) can be assigned to those particles B) which have a diameter of less than or equal to the d₉₀ value.

Preferably, dispersions A) of which the films in the dried state have a specific conductivity of greater than 10 S/cm, particularly preferably greater than 20 S/cm, very particularly preferably greater than 50 S/cm, extremely preferably greater than 100 S/cm and in a particularly preferred embodiment greater than 200 S/cm are employed.

In the process, the dispersion A) preferably has a content of metal cations of less than 5,000 mg/kg, particularly preferably less than 1,000 mg/kg, very particularly preferably less than 200 mg/kg.

In the process, the dispersion A) preferably has a content of transition metals of less than 1,000 mg/kg, particularly preferably less than 100 mg/kg, very particularly preferably less than 20 mg/kg.

In the process, the dispersion A) preferably has an iron content of less than 1,000 mg/kg, particularly preferably less than 100 mg/kg, very particularly preferably less than 20 mg/kg.

The low concentrations of metals in the dispersions have the great advantage that the dielectric is not damaged during formation of the solid electrolyte and during later operation of the capacitor.

In the electrolyte capacitor produced by the process according to the invention, the electrode material forms a porous body having a high surface area and is e.g. in the form of a porous sintered body or a roughened film. In the following, this porous body is also called the electrode body for short.

The electrode body covered with a dielectric is also called the oxidized electrode body for short in the following. The term “oxidized electrode body” also includes those electrode bodies which are covered with a dielectric which has not been prepared by oxidation of the electrode body.

The electrode body covered with a dielectric and completely or partly with a solid electrolyte is also called the capacitor body for short in the following.

Outer surface of the capacitor body is understood as meaning the outside surfaces of the capacitor body.

In the context of the invention, the term polymer includes all compounds having more than one identical or different recurring unit.

Conductive polymers are understood as meaning here in particular the compound class of π-conjugated polymers which have an electrical conductivity after oxidation or reduction. Preferably, conductive polymers are understood as meaning those π-conjugated polymers which have an electrical conductivity of the order of at least 1 μS cm⁻¹ after oxidation.

The particles B) of the electrically conductive polymer in the dispersion A) preferably comprise at least one polythiophene, polypyrrole or polyaniline, which are optionally substituted.

Particularly preferably, the particles B) of the electrically conductive polymer comprise at least one polythiophene having recurring units of the general formula (I) or of the formula (II) or recurring units of the general formulae (I) and (II)

wherein

A represents an optionally substituted C1-C5-alkylene radical,

R represents a linear or branched, optionally substituted C1-C18-alkyl radical, an optionally substituted C5-C12-cycloalkyl radical, an optionally substituted C6-C14-aryl radical, an optionally substituted C7-C18-aralkyl radical, an optionally substituted C1-C4-hydroxyalkyl radical or a hydroxyl radical,

x represents an integer from 0 to 8 and

in the case where several radicals R are bonded to A, these can be identical or different.

The general formulae (I) and (II) are to be understood as meaning that x substituents R can be bonded to the alkylene radical A.

Polythiophenes having recurring units of the general formula (I), (II) or recurring units of the general formula (I) and (II) wherein A represents an optionally substituted C₂-C₃-alkylene radical and x represents 0 or 1 are particularly preferred.

Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene), which is optionally substituted, is very particularly preferred as the conductive polymer of the solid electrolyte.

In the context of the invention, the prefix poly- is to be understood as meaning that more than one identical or different recurring unit is contained in the polymer or polythiophene. The polythiophenes contain a total of n recurring units of the general formula (I) or of the general formula (II) or of the general formulae (I) and (II), wherein n is an integer from 2 to 2,000, preferably 2 to 100. The recurring units of the general formula (I) and/or (II) can in each case be identical or different within a polythiophene. Polythiophenes having in each case identical recurring units of the general formula (e) (I) or (II) or (I) and (II) are preferred.

The polythiophenes preferably in each case carry H on the end groups.

In the context of the invention, C₁-C₅-alkylene radicals are preferably methylene, ethylene, n-propylene, n-butylene or n-pentylene. C₁-C₁₈-Alkyl R preferably represent linear or branched C₁-C₁₈-alkyl radicals, such as methyl, ethyl, n- or iso-propyl, n-, iso-, sec- or tert-butyl, n-pentyl, 1-methylbutyl, 2-methylbutyl, 3-methylbutyl, 1-ethylpropyl, 1,1-dimethylpropyl, 1,2-dimethylpropyl, 2,2-dimethylpropyl, n-hexyl, n-heptyl, n-octyl, 2-ethylhexyl, n-nonyl, n-decyl, n-undecyl, n-dodecyl, n-tridecyl, n-tetradecyl, n-hexadecyl or n-octadecyl, C₅-C₁₂-cycloalkyl radicals R represent, for example, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, cycloheptyl, cyclooctyl, cyclononyl or cyclodecyl, C₅-C₁₄-aryl radicals R represent, for example, phenyl or naphthyl, and C₇-C₁₈-aralkyl radicals R represent, for example, benzyl, o-, m-, p-tolyl, 2,3-, 2,4-, 2,5-, 2,6-, 3,4-, 3,5-xylyl or mesityl. The above list serves to illustrate the invention by way of example and is not to be considered as conclusive.

As stated above, radicals R and A can be substituted. In the context of the invention, possible optional further substituents of the radicals A and/or of the radicals R are numerous organic groups, for example alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, aralkyl, alkoxy, halogen, ether, thioether, disulfide, sulfoxide, sulfone, sulfonate, amino, aldehyde, keto, carboxylic acid ester, carboxylic acid, carbonate, carboxylate, cyano, alkylsilane and alkoxysilane groups as well as carboxamide groups.

Possible substituents for polyaniline or polypyrrole are, for example, the radicals A and R listed above and/or the further substituents of the radicals A and R. Unsubstituted polyanilines are preferred.

The scope of the invention includes all the radical definitions, parameters and explanations which are given above and listed in the following and are general or mentioned in preferred ranges among one another, that is to say also in any desired combination between the particular ranges and preferred ranges.

The polythiophenes employed as the solid electrolyte in the preferred process can be neutral or cationic. In preferred embodiments they are cationic, “cationic” relating only to the charges which sit on the polythiophene main chain. Depending on the substituent on the radicals R, the polythiophenes can carry positive and negative charges in the structural unit, the positive charges being on the polythiophene main chain and the negative charges optionally being on the radicals R substituted by sulfonate or carboxylate groups. In this context, the positive charges of the polythiophene main chain can be partly or completely satisfied by the anionic groups optionally present on the radicals R. Viewed overall, the polythiophenes can be cationic, neutral or even anionic in these cases. Nevertheless, in the context of the invention they are all regarded as cationic polythiophenes, since the positive charges on the polythiophene main chain are decisive. The positive charges are not shown in the formulae, since their precise number and position cannot be determined unambiguously. However, the number of positive charges is at least 1 and not more than n, where n is the total number of all the recurring units (identical or different) within the polythiophene.

To compensate the positive charge, if this is not already done by the optionally sulfonate- or carboxylate-substituted and therefore negatively charged radicals R, the cationic polythiophenes require anions as counter-anions.

Counter-ions can be monomeric or polymeric anions, the latter also being called polyanions in the following.

Polymeric anions are preferred to monomeric anions since they contribute towards the film formation, and due to their size lead to electrically conductive films which are more stable to heat.

Polymeric anions here can be, for example, anions of polymeric carboxylic acids, such as polyacrylic acids, polymethacrylic acids or polymaleic acids, or polymeric sulfonic acids, such as polystyrenesulfonic acids and polyvinylsulfonic acids. These polycarboxylic and -sulfonic acids can also be copolymers of vinylcarboxylic and vinylsulfonic acids with other polymerizable monomers, such as acrylic acid esters and styrene.

An anion of a polymeric carboxylic or sulfonic acid is preferred as the polymeric anion in the particles B) mentioned.

The anion of polystyrenesulfonic acid (PSS) is particularly preferred as the polymeric anion.

The molecular weight of the polyacids which supply the polyanions is preferably 1,000 to 2,000,000, particularly preferably 2,000 to 500,000. The polyacids or their alkali metal salts are commercially obtainable, e.g. polystyrenesulfonic acids and polyacrylic acids, or can be prepared by known processes (see e.g. Houben Weyl, Methoden der organischen Chemie, vol. E 20 Makromolekulare Stoffe, part 2, (1987), p. 1141 et seq.).

The dispersion A) can comprise the polymeric anion(s) and electrically conductive polymers in particular in a weight ratio of from 0.5:1 to 50:1, preferably from 1:1 to 30:1, particularly preferably 2:1 to 20:1. The weight of the electrically conductive polymers corresponds here to the weight of the monomers employed, assuming that complete conversion takes place during the polymerization.

Anions which serve as monomeric anions are, for example, those of C₁-C₂₀-alkanesulfonic acids, such as methane-, ethane-, propane-, butane- or higher sulfonic acids, such as dodecanesulfonic acid, of aliphatic perfluorosulfonic acids, such as trifluoromethanesulfonic acid, perfluorobutanesulfonic acid or perfluorooctanesulfonic acid, of aliphatic C₁-C₂₀-carboxylic acids, such as 2-ethylhexylcarboxylic acid, of aliphatic perfluorocarboxylic acids, such as trifluoroacetic acid or perfluorooctanoic acid, and of aromatic sulfonic acids optionally substituted by C₁-C₂₀-alkyl groups, such as benzenesulfonic acid, o-toluenesulfonic acid, p-toluenesulfonic acid or dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid, and of cycloalkanesulfonic acids, such as camphorsulfonic acid, or tetrafluoroborates, hexafluorophosphates, perchlorates, hexafluoroantimonates, hexafluoroarsenates or hexachloroantimonates.

The anions of p-toluenesulfonic acid, methanesulfonic acid or camphorsulfonic acid are preferred as monomeric anions.

Cationic polythiophenes which contain anions as counter-ions for charge compensation are often also called polythiophene/(poly)anion complexes by persons skilled in the art.

The dispersions A) can comprise one or more dispersing agents D). The following solvents may be mentioned as dispersing agents D) by way of example: aliphatic alcohols, such as methanol, ethanol, i-propanol and butanol; aliphatic ketones, such as acetone and methyl ethyl ketone; aliphatic carboxylic acid esters, such as ethyl acetate and butyl acetate; aromatic hydrocarbons, such as toluene and xylene; aliphatic hydrocarbons, such as hexane, heptane and cyclohexane; chlorohydrocarbons, such as methylene chloride and dichloroethane; aliphatic nitriles, such as acetonitrile; aliphatic sulfoxides and sulfones, such as dimethylsulfoxide and sulfolane; aliphatic carboxylic acid amides, such as methylacetamide, dimethylacetamide and dimethylformamide; and aliphatic and araliphatic ethers, such as diethyl ether and anisole. Water or a mixture of water with the abovementioned organic solvents can furthermore also be used as the dispersing agent D).

Preferred dispersing agents D) are water or other protic solvents, such as alcohols, e.g. methanol, ethanol, i-propanol and butanol, and mixtures of water with these alcohols, water being the particularly preferred solvent.

The dispersion A) can moreover comprise further components, such as surface-active substances, e.g. ionic and nonionic surfactants or adhesion promoters, such as e.g. organofunctional silanes or hydrolysates thereof, e.g. 3-glycidoxypropyltrialkoxysilane, 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, 3-mercaptopropyl-trimethoxysilane, 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane, vinyltrimethoxysilane or octyltriethoxysilane, crosslinking agents, such as melamine compounds, masked isocyanates, functional silanes—e.g. tetraethoxysilane, alkoxysilane hydrolysates, e.g. based on tetraethoxysilane, or epoxysilanes, such as 3-glycidoxypropyltrialkoxysilane—polyurethanes, polyacrylates or polyolefin dispersions.

The dispersions A) preferably comprise further additives which increase the conductivity, such as e.g. compounds containing ether groups, such as e.g. tetrahydrofuran, compounds containing lactone groups, such as γ-butyrolactone and γ-valerolactone, compounds containing amide or lactam groups, such as caprolactam, N-methylcaprolactam, N,N-dimethylacetamide, N-methylacetamide, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), N-methylformamide, N-methylformanilide, N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP), N-octylpyrrolidone and pyrrolidone, sulfones and sulfoxides, such as e.g. sulfolane (tetramethylene sulfone) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), sugars or sugar derivatives, such as e.g. sucrose, glucose, fructose and lactose, sugar alcohols, such as e.g. sorbitol and mannitol, furan derivatives, such as e.g. 2-furancarboxylic acid and 3-furancarboxylic acid, and/or di- or polyalcohols, such as e.g. ethylene glycol, glycerol and di- and triethylene glycol. Tetrahydrofuran, N-methylformamide, N-methylpyrrolidone, ethylene glycol, dimethylsulfoxide or sorbitol are particularly preferably employed as conductivity-increasing additives.

The dispersions A) can moreover comprise one or more organic binders which are soluble in organic solvents, such as polyvinyl acetate, polycarbonate, polyvinylbutyral, polyacrylic acid esters, polymethacrylic acid esters, polystyrene, polyacrylonitrile, polyvinyl chloride, polybutadiene, polyisoprene, polyethers, polyesters, silicones or styrene/acrylic acid ester, vinyl acetate/acrylic acid ester and ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymers, or water-soluble binders, such as polyvinyl alcohols.

The dispersions A) can have a pH of from 1 to 14, and a pH of from 1 to 8 is preferred. For corrosion-sensitive dielectrics, such as, for example, aluminium oxides or niobium oxides, dispersions having a pH of from 4 to 8 are preferred, in order not to damage the dielectric.

Bases or acids, for example, can be added to the dispersions to adjust the pH. Those additives which do not impair the film formation of the dispersions and are not volatile at higher temperatures, e.g. soldering temperatures, but remain in the solid electrolyte under these conditions are preferred. such as e.g. the bases 2-dimethylaminoethanol, 2,2′-iminodiethanol or 2,2′,2″-nitrilotriethanol and the acid polystyrenesulfonic acid.

The viscosity of the dispersion A) can be between 0.1 and 500 mPa·s (measured at 20° C. and a shear rate of 100 s⁻¹), depending on the application method. Preferably, the viscosity is 1 to 200 mPa·s, particularly preferably between 1 to 100 mPa·s, very particularly preferably 3 to 50 mPa·s.

FIG. 1 describes a diagrammatic representation of the construction of a solid electrolyte capacitor by the example of a tantalum capacitor comprising

-   1 capacitor body -   5 conductive outer layer optionally present -   6 graphite/silver layer -   7 wire contact to the electrode body 2 -   8 outer contacts -   9 encapsulation -   10 diagram detail

FIG. 2 describes the enlarged diagram detail 10 from FIG. 1 which represents the diagrammatic layer construction of the tantalum capacitor comprising

-   10 diagram detail -   2 porous electrode body (anode) -   3 dielectric -   4 solid electrolyte (cathode) -   5 conductive outer layer optionally present -   6 graphite/silver layer

In principle, such an electrolyte capacitor according to the invention can be produced as follows: Firstly e.g. a valve metal powder having a high surface area is pressed and sintered to give a porous electrode body. In this procedure, an electrical contact wire, preferably of a valve metal, such as e.g. tantalum, is conventionally also pressed into the electrode body. Alternatively, metal films can also be etched in order to obtain a porous film.

The electrode body is then covered, for example by electrochemical oxidation, with a dielectric, i.e. an oxide layer. Thereafter, according to the invention, a dispersion A) comprising at least particles B) of an electrically conductive polymer and a dispersing agent D) is applied to the oxidized electrode body and the dispersing agent D) is at least partly removed and/or cured for formation of the solid electrolyte. Further layers (called conductive outer layer (5) in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2) are optionally applied to the outer layer of the capacitor body. A covering with layers of good conductivity, such as graphite and silver, or a metallic cathode body serves as the electrode for conducting away the current. Finally, the capacitor is contacted and encapsulated.

A process for the production of electrolyte capacitors, characterized in that the electrode material is a valve metal or a compound having electrical properties comparable to a valve metal, is furthermore preferred.

In the context of the invention, valve metal is to be understood as meaning those metals of which the oxide layers do not render current flow equally possible in both directions: If a voltage is applied to the anode, the oxide layers of the valve metals block the current flow, while if a voltage is applied to the cathode, high currents occur, which can destroy the oxide layer. The valve metals include Be, Mg, Al, Ge, Si, Sn, Sb, Bi, Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Ta and W as well as an alloy or compound of at least one of these metals with other elements. The best-known representatives of the valve metals are Al, Ta and Nb. Compounds having electrical properties comparable to a valve metal are those with metallic conductivity which can be oxidized and the oxide layers of which have the properties described above. For example, NbO has metallic conductivity, but in general is not regarded as a valve metal. However, layers of oxidized NbO have the typical properties of valve metal oxide layers, so that NbO or an alloy or compound of NbO with other elements are typical examples of such compounds having electrical properties comparable to a valve metal.

Electrode materials of tantalum, aluminium and those electrode materials based on niobium or niobium oxide are preferred.

Electrode materials based on niobium or niobium oxide are understood as meaning those materials in which niobium or niobium oxide represents the component with the highest substance content.

The electrode material based on niobium or niobium oxide is preferably niobium, NbO, a niobium oxide NbO_(x), wherein x can assume values of from 0.8 to 1.2, niobium nitride, niobium oxynitride or mixtures of these materials, or an alloy or compound of at least one of these materials with other elements.

Preferred alloys are alloys with at least one valve metal, such as, for example, Be, Mg, Al, Ge, Si, Sn, Sb, Bi, Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Ta or W.

Accordingly, the term “oxidizable metal” means not only metals but also an alloy or compound of a metal with other elements, as long as they have metallic conductivity and are oxidizable.

The oxidizable metals are sintered, for example, in powder form to give a porous electrode body, or a porous structure is impressed on a metallic body. The latter can be carried out e.g. by etching of a film.

The porous electrode bodies are oxidized, for example, in a suitable electrolyte, such as e.g. phosphoric acid, by application of a voltage. The level of this forming voltage depends on the oxide layer thickness to be achieved or the later use voltage of the capacitor. Preferred forming voltages are 1 to 300 V, particularly preferably 1 to 80 V.

Preferably, metal powders having a specific charge of from 1,000 to 1,000,000 μC/g, particularly preferably having a specific charge of from 5,000 to 300,000 μC/g, very particularly preferably having a specific charge of from 5,000 to 150,000 μC/g, extremely preferably having a specific charge of from 10,000 to 100,000 μC/g, are employed for the preparation of the electrode body.

In this context, the specific charge is calculated as follows: Specific charge=(capacitance*anodizing voltage)/weight of the oxidized electrode body.

In this context, the capacitance is obtained from the capacitance of the oxidized electrode body, measured at 120 Hz, in an aqueous electrolyte. The electrical conductivity of the electrolyte here is sufficiently high for a drop in capacitance due to the electrical resistance of the electrolyte not yet to occur at 120 Hz. For example, 18% strength aqueous sulfuric acid electrolyte is employed for the measurement.

The electrode bodies employed have a porosity of from 10 to 90%, preferably from 30 to 80%, particularly preferably from 50 to 80%.

The porous electrode bodies have an average pore diameter of from 10 to 10,000 nm, preferably from 50 to 5,000 nm, particularly preferably from 100 to 3,000 nm.

The present invention accordingly particularly preferably provides a process for the production of electrolyte capacitors, characterized in that the valve metal or the compound having electrical properties comparable to a valve metal is tantalum, niobium, aluminium, titanium, zirconium, hafnium, vanadium, an alloy or compound of at least one of these metals with other elements, NbO or an alloy or compound of NbO with other elements.

The dielectric preferably comprises an oxide of the electrode material. It optionally comprises further elements and/or compounds.

The capacitance of the oxidized electrode body depends on the surface area and the thickness of the dielectric, as well as on the nature of the dielectric. The specific charge is a measure of how much charge per unit weight the oxidized electrode body can accommodate. The specific charge is calculated as follows: Specific charge−(capacitance*nominal voltage)/weight of the oxidized electrode body.

The capacitance is obtained from the capacitance of the finished capacitor measured at 120 Hz and the nominal voltage is the specified operating voltage of the capacitor (rated voltage). The weight of the oxidized electrode body relates to the pure weight of the porous electrode material covered with dielectric, without polymer, contacts and encapsulations.

Preferably, the electrolyte capacitors produced by the novel process have a specific charge of from 500 to 500,000 μC/g, particularly preferably a specific charge of from 2,000 to 150,000 μC/g, very particularly preferably a specific charge of from 2,000 to 100,000 μC/g, extremely preferably a specific charge of from 5,000 to 50,000 μC/g.

Precursors for the preparation of conductive polymers of the particles B) in the dispersion, also called precursors in the following, are understood as meaning corresponding monomers or derivatives thereof. Mixture of various precursors can also be used. Suitable monomeric precursors are, for example, optionally substituted thiophenes, pyrroles or anilines, preferably optionally substituted thiophenes, particularly preferably optionally substituted 3,4-alkylenedioxythiophenes.

Substituted 3,4-alkylenedioxythiophenes which may be mentioned by way of example are the compounds of the general formula (III) or (IV) or a mixture of thiophenes of the general formulae (III) and (IV)

wherein

A represents an optionally substituted C₁-C₅-alkylene radical, preferably an optionally substituted C₂-C₃-alkylene radical,

R represents a linear or branched, optionally substituted C₁-C₁₈-alkyl radical, preferably linear or branched, optionally substituted C₁-C₄-alkyl radical, an optionally substituted C₅-C₁₂-cycloalkyl radical, an optionally substituted C₆-C₁₄-aryl radical, an optionally substituted C₇-C₁₈-aralkyl radical, an optionally substituted C₁-C₄-hydroxyalkyl radical, preferably optionally substituted C₁-C₂-hydroxyalkyl radical, or a hydroxyl radical,

x represents an integer from 0 to 8, preferably from 0 to 6, particularly preferably 0 or 1 and

in the case where several radicals R are bonded to A, these can be identical or different.

Optionally substituted 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophenes are very particularly preferred monomeric precursors.

Substituted 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophenes which may be mentioned by way of example are the compounds of the general formula (V)

wherein

R and x have the meaning given for the general formulae (III) and (IV).

In the context of the invention, derivatives of these monomeric precursors are understood as meaning, for example, dimers or trimers of these monomeric precursors. Higher molecular weight derivatives, i.e. tetramers, pentamers etc., of the monomeric precursors are also possible derivatives.

Derivatives of substituted 3,4-alkylenedioxythiophenes which may be mentioned by way of example are the compounds of the general formula (VI)

wherein

n represents an integer from 2 to 20, preferably 2 to 6, particularly preferably 2 or 3, and

A, R and x have the meaning given for the general formulae (III) and (IV).

The derivatives can be built up from either identical or different monomer units and can be employed in the pure form and in a mixture with one another and/or with the monomeric precursors. Oxidized or reduced forms of these precursors are also included by the term “precursors” in the context of the invention, as long as the same conductive polymers are formed during their polymerization as in the case of the precursors listed above.

Possible substituents for the abovementioned precursors, in particular for the thiophenes, preferably for the 3,4-alkylenedioxythiophenes, are the radicals mentioned for R for the general formulae (III) and (IV).

Possible substituents for pyrroles and anilines are, for example, the abovementioned radicals A and R and/or the further substituents of the radicals A and R.

Possible optional further substituents of the radicals A and/or of the radicals R are the organic groups mentioned in connection with the general formulae (I) and (II).

Processes for the preparation of the monomeric precursors for the preparation of conductive polymers and derivatives thereof are known to the person skilled in the art and are described, for example, in L. Groenendaal, F. Jonas, D. Freitag, H. Pielartzik & J. R. Reynolds, Adv. Mater. 12 (2000) 481-494 and literature cited therein.

The 3,4-alkylenoxythiathiophenes of the formula (III) required for the preparation of the polythiophenes to be used are known to the person skilled in the art or can be prepared by known processes (for example in accordance with P. Blanchard, A. Cappon, E. Levillain, Y. Nicolas, P. Frère and J. Roncali, Org. Lett. 4 (4), 2002, p. 607-609).

The preparation of the dispersions from the precursors described above is carried out, for example, under conditions analogous to those mentioned in EP-A 440 957 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,300,575). An improved variant for the preparation of the dispersions is the use of an ion exchanger for removal of the inorganic salt content or a part thereof. Such a variant is described, for example, in DE-A 19627071 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,376,105). The ion exchanger can be stirred with the product, for example, or the product is conveyed over a column packed with an ion exchanger column. By using the ion exchanger, for example, the low metal contents described above can be achieved.

The particle size of the particles B) in the dispersion A) can be reduced, for example, by means of a high pressure homogenizer after the desalination. This operation can also be repeated in order to increase the effect. Particularly high pressures of between 100 and 2,000 bar have proved advantageous for greatly reducing the particle size.

A preparation of the polyaniline/polyanion or polythiophene/polyanion complex and subsequent dispersion or redispersion in one or more solvent(s) is also possible.

The solids content of the particles B) of the electrically conductive polymer in the dispersion A) is 0.1-90 wt. %, preferably 0.5-30 wt. % and very particularly preferably 0.5-10 wt. %.

The particles B) of the conductive polymer preferably form a stable dispersion. However, unstable dispersions can also be used, in that these are stirred, rolled or shaken up, for example, before use in order to ensure a uniform distribution of the particles B).

The dispersions A) are applied to the dielectric of the electrode body by known processes, e.g. by spincoating, impregnation, pouring, dripping on, spraying. atomizing on, knife-coating on, brushing or printing, for example ink-jet, screen, contact or tampon printing.

The penetration of the dispersion into the porous electrode body can be facilitated, for example, by increased or reduced pressure, vibration, ultrasound or heat.

The application can be carried out on to the dielectric of the electrode body directly or using an adhesion promoter, for example a silane, such as e.g. organofunctional silanes or hydrolysates thereof, e.g. 3-glycidoxypropyltrialkoxysilane, 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane, 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane, vinyltrimethoxysilane or octyltriethoxysilane, and/or one or more other functional layers.

After application of the dispersion A), the dispersing agent D) is preferably removed, so that the solid electrolyte can form from the particles B) and optionally further additives in the dispersion. However, it is also possible for at least a part of the dispersing agent D) to remain in the solid electrolyte. Depending on the nature of the dispersing agent D), this can also be cured either in its entirety, or only the part still remaining after the partial removal.

The removal of the dispersing agent D) after application of the dispersion can be carried out by simple evaporation at room temperature. However, to achieve higher processing speeds it is more advantageous to remove the dispersing agents D) at elevated temperatures, e.g. at temperatures of from 20 up to 300° C., preferably 40 up to 250° C. A thermal after-treatment can be combined directly with the removal of the solvent, or can be carried out at a time removed from the production of the coating.

The duration of the heat treatment is 5 seconds to several hours, depending on the nature of the dispersion used for the coating. Temperature profiles with different temperatures and dwell times can also be employed for the heat treatment.

The heat treatment can be carried out e.g. by a procedure in which the coated oxidized electrode bodies are moved though a heating chamber, which is at the desired temperature, at a speed such that the desired dwell time at the chosen temperature is achieved, or are brought into contact for the desired dwell time with a hot-plate which is at the desired temperature. Furthermore, the heat treatment can be carried out, for example, in a heating oven or several heating ovens each with different temperatures.

For metal oxide dielectrics, such as, for example, the oxides of the valve metals, after the formation of the solid electrolyte it may be advantageous to re-form the oxide film electrochemically, in order to repair any defects in the oxide film and thereby to lower the residual current of the finished capacitor. During this so-called re-forming, the capacitor body is dipped into an electrolyte and a positive voltage is applied to the electrode body. The current which flows re-forms the oxide at defects in the oxide film or destroys conductive polymer at defects over which a high current flows.

Depending on the nature of the oxidized electrode body, it may be advantageous to impregnate the oxidized electrode body with the dispersions further times, in order to achieve thicker polymer layers and/or a higher covering of the dielectric surface.

Preferably, the application of the dispersion A) and the at least partial removal and/or curing of the dispersing agent D) are carried out several times.

Further steps can optionally be carried out between a) the application of the dispersion and b) the at least partial removal and/or curing of the dispersing agent D).

As optional further steps, for example, some of the dispersion can be removed from the oxidized electrode body again, a further impregnation can be carried out with the same or a different dispersion, rinsing with the same or different solvents optionally containing additives can be carried out, or storage can take place.

It has been found, surprisingly, that removal of the dispersion from the outer surface of the oxidized electrode body after the application and before the drying, especially in the case of several impregnating and drying cycles, leads to a higher covering and a lower ESR.

A process is accordingly preferred in which after application of the dispersion A), at least some of the particles B) of the conductive polymer which are on the outer surface of the electrode body, particularly preferably as many as possible, are removed. This can be carried out e.g. by rinsing off, dabbing off, blowing off, spinning off or the like. The use of, for example, ultrasound, heat or radiation to remove the outer polymer film is also possible. Rinsing with a solvent, preferably with the solvent which is used as the dispersing agent, is preferred.

However, the particles B) of the conductive polymer can also be removed from the outer surface of the electrode body, for example by ultrasound, a laser beam, solvents or mechanical detachment, after the at least partial removal and/or curing of the dispersing agent D).

The covering of the dielectric with the solid electrolyte can be determined as follows: the capacitance of the capacitor is measured at 120 Hz in the dry and wet state. The degree of covering is the ratio of the capacitance in the dry state to the capacitance in the wet state, expressed in percent. Dry state means that the capacitor has been dried at elevated temperature (80-120° C.) for several hours before it is measured. Wet state means that the capacitor is exposed to a saturated atmospheric humidity under elevated pressure, for example in a steam pressure boiler, for several hours. During this procedure the moisture penetrates into pores which are not covered by the solid electrolyte and acts as a liquid electrolyte there.

The covering of the dielectric by the solid electrolyte is preferably greater than 50%, particularly preferably greater than 70%, very particularly preferably greater than 80%.

After production of the solid electrolyte, further conductive layers can be applied to the capacitor body, such as e.g. a conductive outer layer. Preferably, a polymeric outer layer, for example as described in European Patent Application EP-A 1 524 678 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,987,663), is applied. Further layers of good conductivity, such as, for example, graphite and/or silver layers, serve as a current collector. Finally, the capacitor is contacted and encapsulated.

The process according to the invention thus renders possible the production of solid electrolyte capacitors having a low equivalent series resistance (ESR) and low residual current, in which no in situ polymerization is necessary, the dielectric is not damaged by metal ions and a solid electrolyte which is more stable to heat than in the case of known process is formed. Furthermore, the process according to the invention also renders possible the production of polymer-solid electrolyte capacitors, the electrode materials of which are based on niobium or niobium oxide and which have a low residual current and low ESR, production of which was not hitherto possible by means of in situ polymerization of the solid electrolyte.

On the basis of their low residual current and their low ESR, the electrolyte capacitors produced according to the invention are outstandingly suitable for use as a component in electronic circuits, for example as a filter capacitor or decoupling capacitor. The present invention also provides the use. Electronic circuits such as are found, for example, in computers (desktop, laptop, server), in computer peripheral equipment (e.g. PC cards), in portable electronic equipment, such as e.g. mobile telephones, digital cameras or electronic entertainment systems, in equipment for electronic entertainment systems, such as e.g. in CD/DVD payers and computer game consoles, in navigation systems, in telecommunications equipment, in domestic appliances, in voltage supplies or in automobile electronics are preferred.

The following examples serve to explain the invention by way of example and are not to be interpreted as a limitation.

EXAMPLES Example 1

868 g deionized water and 330 g of an aqueous polystyrenesulfonic acid solution having an average molecular weight of 70,000 and a solids content of 3.8 wt. % were initially introduced into a 2 l three-necked flask with a stirrer and internal thermometer. The reaction temperature was kept between 20 and 25° C. 5.1 g 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene were added, while stirring. The solution was stirred for 30 minutes. 0.03 g iron(III) sulfate and 9.5 g sodium persulfate were then added and the solution was stirred for a further 24 h.

After the reaction had ended, to remove inorganic salts 100 ml of a strongly acid cation exchanger and 250 ml of a weakly basic anion exchanger were added and the solution was stirred for a further 2 h. The ion exchanger was filtered off. The poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/polystyrenesulfonate dispersion was homogenized ten times with a high pressure homogenizer under a pressure of 700 bar. The dispersion was then concentrated to a solids content of 1.6%.

The dispersion A)-1 prepared in this way had the following particle size distribution:

d₁₀ 19 nm d₅₀ 26 nm d₉₀ 40 nm

The diameter of the particles B) of the conductive polymer is based on a weight distribution of the particles B) in the dispersion as a function of the particle diameter. The determination was carried out via an ultracentrifuge measurement. The particle size was determined in the swollen state of the particles.

The viscosity of the dispersion was 26 mPa*s at a shear rate of 100 Hz and 20° C. An ICP analysis of the metal contents of dispersion A)-1 gave the following values:

Sodium (Na): 110 mg/kg

Magnesium (Mg): 0.58 mg/kg

Aluminium (Al): 1.0 mg/kg

Silicon (Si): 1.2 mg/kg

Phosphorus (P): 5.9 mg/kg

Potassium (K): 0.53 mg/kg

Calcium (Ca): 3.9 mg/kg

Chromium (Cr): 0.16 mg/kg

Iron (Fe): 0.89 mg/kg

Zinc (Zn): <0.01 mg/kg

Example 2

5 g dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) were added to 100 g of dispersion A)-1 from Example 1 and the mixture was stirred to form a dispersion A)-2. One part of this dispersion A)-2 was spin-coated on to a glass microscope slide (26 mm*26 mm*1 mm) by means of a spincoater (Chemat Technology KW-4A) at 1,000 rpm for 5 seconds. The sample was dried at 120° C. for 10 min. Two opposite edges of the microscope slide were then coated with conductive silver. After drying of the conductive silver, the two silver strips were contacted and the surface resistance was determined with a Keithley 199 Multimeter. The layer thickness was determined with a Tencor Alpha Step 500 Surface Profiler. The specific conductivity σ was determined from the surface resistance and layer thickness d from σ=1/(R_(s)*d). The layer thickness was 120 nm and the specific conductivity was 483 S/cm.

Example 3 3.1 Production of Oxidized Electrode Bodies

Tantalum powder having a specific capacitance of 50,000 μFV/g was pressed, with inclusion of a tantalum wire 7, to pellets and sintered in order to form a [missing noun] having the dimensions of 4.2 mm*3 mm*1 mm. The porous electrode bodies (2) had an average pore diameter of 580 nm and were anodized in a phosphoric acid electrolyte at 30 V for formation of a dielectric.

3.2 Production of the Solid Electrolyte by the Process According to the Invention

100 g of dispersion A)-1 from Example 1, 4 g dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and 0.5 g 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (Silquest A-187, OSi Specialties) were mixed intensively in a glass beaker with a stirrer to form a dispersion A)-3.

The oxidized electrode bodies were impregnated in this dispersion A)-3 for 1 min. The impregnated electrode bodies were then rinsed under running water in order to remove the dispersion A)-3 on the outsides of the electrode body. Thereafter, drying was carried out at 120° C. for 10 min. Impregnation, rinsing and drying were carried out nine further times.

3.3 Production of a Polymeric Outer Layer Preparation of a Dispersion A)-4

868 g deionized water and 330 g of an aqueous polystyrenesulfonic acid solution having an average molecular weight of 70,000 and a solids content of 3.8 wt. % were initially introduced into a 2 l three-necked flask with a stirrer and internal thermometer. The reaction temperature was kept between 20 and 25° C. 5.1 g 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene were added, while stirring. The solution was stirred for 30 minutes. 0.03 g iron(III) sulfate and 9.5 g sodium persulfate were then added and the solution was stirred for a further 24 h.

After the reaction had ended, to remove inorganic salts 100 ml of a strongly acid cation exchanger and 250 ml of a weakly basic anion exchanger were added and the solution was stirred for a further 2 h. The ion exchanger was filtered off.

b) Preparation of a PEDT/Toluenesulfonate Powder:

2.5 l demineralized water were initially introduced into a 5 l glass reactor with a stirrer and thermometer. 214.2 g p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate and 2.25 g iron(III) sulfate heptahydrate were introduced, while stirring. When everything had dissolved, 85.8 g 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene were added and the mixture was stirred for 30 minutes. 192.9 g sodium peroxodisulfate were then introduced, while stirring, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for a further 24 hours. After the end of the reaction, the PEDT/toluenesulfonate powder formed was filtered off on a porcelain suction filter, washed with 3 l demineralized water and finally dried at 100° C. for 6 hours. 89 g of a blue-black PEDT-toluenesulfonate powder were obtained.

180 g of the PEDT/PSS dispersion A)-4, 10 g of a sulfopolyester (Eastek 1100, Eastman), 8 g dimethylsulfoxide, 1 g 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (Silquest A-187, OSi Specialties) and 0.4 g of wetting agent (Dynol 604, Air Products) were mixed intensively in a glass beaker with a stirrer for one hour. 2 g of the PEDT/toluenesulfonate powder were then dispersed in by means of a bead mill dissolver unit. For this, 300 g zirconium oxide beads (Ø1 mm) were added and the mixture was stirred at 7,000 rpm for 1 hour, while cooling with water. Finally, the grinding beads were separated off over a 0.8 μm sieve. This dispersion A)-5 obtained had a solids content of 4.7%.

The capacitor bodies from 3.2 were impregnated in this dispersion A)-5 and then dried at 120° C. for 10 min.

Finally, the electrode bodies were coated with a graphite and silver layer.

The 18 capacitors produced in the above manner had on average the following electrical values:

Capacitance: 84.3 μF

ESR: 22.4 mΩ

Residual current: 0.16 μA

The capacitance was determined at 120 Hz and the equivalent series resistance (ESR) at 100 kHz by means of an LCR meter (Agilent 4284A). The residual current was determined with a Keithley 199 Multimeter three minutes after application of a 10 V voltage.

Comparison Example 1

A dispersion was prepared analogously to Example 1, but without a subsequent homogenization.

The dispersion A)-6 prepared in this way had a following particle size distribution:

d₁₀  60 nm d₅₀ 147 nm d₉₀ 244 nm

9 capacitors were produced analogously to Example 3, the following dispersion A)-7, however, being used for the formation of the solid electrolyte.

100 g of dispersion A)-6, 4 g dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and 0.5 g 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (Silquest A-187, OSi Specialties) were mixed intensively in a glass beaker with a stirrer to form a dispersion A)-7.

The 9 capacitors produced had on average the following electrical values:

Capacitance: 2.8 μF

ESR: 123.6 mΩ

Residual current: 0.24 μA

The capacitance was determined at 120 Hz and the equivalent series resistance (ESR) at 100 kHz by means of an LCR meter (Agilent 4284A). The residual current was determined with a Keithley 199 Multimeter three minutes after application of a 10 V voltage.

The capacitance of these capacitors is only approx. 3% of the capacitance in Example 3. It can be concluded from this that the conductive particles from dispersion A)-7 in the comparison example did not penetrate sufficiently into the pores of the electrode body, although the average particle diameter (147 nm) is significantly smaller than the average pore diameter (580 nm) of the electrode bodies.

Comparison Example 2

18 anodized electrode bodies were produced analogously to Example 3.1. These electrode bodies were provided with a solid electrolyte by means of a chemical in situ polymerization.

For this, a solution consisting of one part by weight of 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (BAYTRON® M, H.C. Starck GmbH) and 20 parts by weight of a 40 wt % strength ethanolic solution of iron(III) p-toluenesulfonate (BAYTRON® C-E, H.C. Starck GmbH) was prepared.

The solution was used for impregnating the 18 anodized electrode bodies 2. The electrode bodies 2 were impregnated in this solution and then dried at room temperature (20° C.) for 30 min. Thereafter, they were heat-treated at 50° C. in a drying cabinet for 30 min. The electrode bodies were then washed in a 2 wt. % strength aqueous solution of p-toluenesulfonic acid for 60 min. The electrode bodies were re-formed in a 0.25 wt. % strength aqueous solution of p-toluenesulfonic acid for 30 min and then rinsed in distilled water and dried. The impregnation, drying, heat treatment and re-forming described were carried out a further two more times with the same electrode bodies.

The capacitor bodies were then provided with a polymeric outer layer analogously to Example 3.3. Finally, the electrode bodies were coated with a graphite and silver layer.

The 18 capacitors produced had on average the following electrical values:

Capacitance: 83.0 μF.

ESR: 23.1 mΩ

Residual current: 4.85 μA

The capacitance was determined at 120 Hz and the equivalent series resistance (ESR) at 100 kHz by means of an LCR meter (Agilent 4284A). The residual current was determined with a Keithley 199 Multimeter three minutes after application of a 10 V voltage.

The same capacitances and ESR values are achieved with the process according to the invention (Example 3). However, the process according to the invention for the formation of the solid electrolyte takes only 2 h, requires no chemical reaction and is based on aqueous dispersions. On the other hand, the chemical in situ process takes approx. 9 h and solutions which are an explosion hazard must be handled. In spite of intensive washing, not all the iron salts can be removed in the in situ process. In contrast to the virtually metal-free process according to the invention, this leads to a significantly higher residual current in the comparison example.

Example 4 4.1 Production of Oxidized Electrode Bodies

Tantalum powder having a specific capacitance of 150,000 μFV/g was pressed, with inclusion of a tantalum wire 7, to pellets and sintered in order to form a [missing noun] having the dimensions of 1.7 mm*1.1 mm*1.1 mm. The porous electrode bodies 2 had an average pore diameter of 190 nm and were anodized in a phosphoric acid electrolyte at 12 V for formation of a dielectric.

4.2 Production of the Solid Electrolyte by the Process According to the Invention

100 g of dispersion A)-1 from Example 1, 4 g dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and 0.5 g 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (Silquest A-187, OSi Specialties) were mixed intensively in a glass beaker with a stirrer to form a dispersion A)-8.

The oxidized electrode bodies were impregnated in this dispersion A)-8 for 1 min. The impregnated electrode bodies were then rinsed under running water in order to remove the dispersion A)-8 on the outsides of the electrode body. Thereafter, drying was carried out at 120° C. for 10 min. Impregnation, rinsing and drying were carried out nine further times.

4.3 Production of a Polymeric Outer Layer

868 g deionized water and 330 g of an aqueous polystyrenesulfonic acid solution having an average molecular weight of 70,000 and a solids content of 3.8 wt. % were initially introduced into a 2 l three-necked flask with a stirrer and internal thermometer. The reaction temperature was kept between 20 and 25° C.

5.1 g 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene were added, while stirring. The solution was stirred for 30 minutes. 0.03 g iron(III) sulfate and 9.5 g sodium persulfate were then added and the solution was stirred for a further 24 h.

After the reaction had ended, to remove inorganic salts 100 ml of a strongly acid cation exchanger and 250 ml of a weakly basic anion exchanger were added and the solution was stirred for a further 2 h. The ion exchanger was filtered off.

180 g of this PEDT/PSS dispersion, 5 g of a sulfopolyester (Eastek 1100, Eastman), 8 g dimethylsulfoxide, 1 g 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (Silquest A-187, OSi Specialties) and 0.4 g of wetting agent (Dynol 604, Air Products) were mixed intensively in a glass beaker with a stirrer for one hour.

The capacitor bodies were impregnated in this dispersion A)-9 and then dried at 120° C. for 10 min. The impregnation and drying were carried out a further time.

Finally, the electrode bodies were coated with a graphite and silver layer.

The 9 capacitors produced had on average the following electrical values:

Capacitance: 64.2 μF

ESR: 63.3 mΩ

Residual current: 2.6 μA

The capacitance was determined at 120 Hz and the equivalent series resistance (ESR) at 100 kHz by means of an LCR meter (Agilent 4284A). The residual current was determined with a Keithley 199 Multimeter three minutes after application of a 4 V voltage.

Example 5

100 g of dispersion A)-1 from Example 1, 4 g dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and 0.5 g 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (Silquest A-187, OSi Specialties) were mixed intensively in a glass beaker with a stirrer to form a dispersion. The pH of this dispersion was then adjusted to a value of 6 by addition of 2-dimethylaminoethanol.

Porous aluminium films 4 mm*4 mm in size which had been anodized at 20 V were impregnated in this dispersion for 1 min. The impregnated electrode bodies were then rinsed under running water in order to remove the dispersion on the outsides of the electrode body. Thereafter, drying was carried out at 120° C. for 10 min. Impregnation, rinsing and drying were carried out nine further times.

The preparation of a polymeric outer layer was carried out analogously to Example 4.3.

Finally, the electrode bodies were coated with a graphite and silver layer.

The 9 capacitors produced had on average the following electrical values:

Capacitance: 14 μF

ESR: 15 mΩ

Residual current: 0.26 μA

The capacitance was determined at 120 Hz and the equivalent series resistance (ESR) at 100 kHz by means of an LCR meter (Agilent 4284A). The residual current was determined with a Keithley 199 Multimeter three minutes after application of a 6.3 V voltage.

Example 6 6.1 Production of Oxidized Electrode Bodies

Niobium oxide powder having a specific capacitance of 80,000 μFV/g was pressed, with inclusion of a tantalum wire 7, to pellets and sintered in order to form a [missing noun] having the dimensions of 5 mm*3.5 mm*1 mm. The porous electrode bodies 2 were anodized in a phosphoric acid electrolyte at 30 V for formation of a dielectric.

6.2 Production of the Solid Electrolyte by the Process According to the Invention

The oxidized electrode bodies were impregnated in dispersion A)-3 from Example 3.2 for 1 min. The impregnated electrode bodies were then rinsed under running water in order to remove the dispersion A)-3 on the outsides of the electrode body. Thereafter, drying was carried out at 120° C. for 10 min. Impregnation, rinsing and drying were carried out nine further times.

6.3 Production of a Polymeric Outer Layer

The capacitor bodies from 3.2 were impregnated in this dispersion A)-5 from Example 3.3 and then dried at 120° C. for 10 min. The drying and impregnation were carried out a second time.

Finally, the electrode bodies were coated with a graphite and silver layer and aged at a voltage of 15 V for 1 h.

The 18 capacitors produced had on average the following electrical values:

Capacitance: 114 μF

ESR: 43 mΩ

Residual current: 3.5 μA

The capacitance was determined at 120 Hz and the equivalent series resistance (ESR) at 100 kHz by means of an LCR meter (Agilent 4284A) at a bias voltage of 10 V. The residual current was determined with a Keithley 199 Multimeter three minutes after application of a 10 V voltage.

Comparison Example 3

18 anodized electrode bodies were produced analogously to Example 6.1. These electrode bodies were provided with a solid electrolyte by means of a chemical in situ polymerization.

For this, a solution consisting of one part by weight of 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (BAYTRON® M, H.C. Starck GmbH) and 20 parts by weight of a 40 wt. % strength ethanolic solution of iron(III) p-toluenesulfonate (BAYTRON® C-E, H.C. Starck GmbH) was prepared.

The solution was used for impregnating the anodized electrode bodies 2. The electrode bodies 2 were impregnated in this solution and then dried at room temperature (20° C.) for 30 min. Thereafter, they were heat-treated at 50° C. in a drying cabinet for 30 min. The electrode bodies were then washed in a 2 wt. % strength aqueous solution of p-toluenesulfonic acid for 60 min. The electrode bodies were re-formed in a 0.25 wt. % strength aqueous solution of p-toluenesulfonic acid for 30 min and then rinsed in distilled water and dried. The impregnation, drying, heat treatment and re-forming described were carried out a further two more times with the same electrode bodies.

The capacitor bodies were then provided with a polymeric outer layer analogously to Example 6.3. Finally, the electrode bodies were coated with a graphite and silver layer and aged at a voltage of 15 V for 1 h.

All the capacitors were electrically short-circuited after production.

Accordingly, polymer solid electrolyte capacitors having a low ESR and low residual current can be produced from electrode materials based on niobium or niobium oxide with the process according to the invention (Example 6). On the other hand, it is not possible to achieve low residual currents with conventional chemical in situ polymerization processes (Comparison Example 3). All the references described above are incorporated by reference in its entirety for all useful purposes.

While there is shown and described certain specific structures embodying the invention, it will be manifest to those skilled in the art that various modifications and rearrangements of the parts may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the underlying inventive concept and that the same is not limited to the particular forms herein shown and described. 

We claim:
 1. An electrolyte capacitor produced with the process which comprises applying a dispersion A) on to a porous body wherein said porous body comprises a porous electrode body of an electrode material and a dielectric which covers the surface of the electrode material, wherein said dispersion A) is directly applied onto the dielectric surface wherein the dispersion comprises at least particles B) of an electrically conductive polymer and a dispersing agent D), and and for the formation of a solid electrolyte which completely or partly covers the dielectric surface, the dispersing agent D) is at least partly removed and/or cured, wherein the viscosity of dispersion A) can be between 0.1 and 500 mPas (measured at 20° C. and a shear rate of 100 s⁻¹), wherein the particles B) of the conductive polymer in the dispersion A) have an average diameter of 5 to 40 nm, and films produced from particles B) have a specific conductivity in the dry state of greater than 10 S/cm and wherein the particles B) of the conductive polymer in the dispersion A) have d₁₀ value of the diameter distribution of greater than 5 nm, wherein the d10 value of the diameter distribution states that 10% of the total weight of all the particles B) of the conductive polymer in the dispersion A) can be assigned to those particles B) which have a diameter of less than or equal to the d10 value and have d₉₀ value of the diameter distribution of less than 50 nm, wherein the d90 value of the diameter distribution states that 90% of the total weight of all the particles B) of the conductive polymer in the dispersion A) can be assigned to those particles B) which have a diameter of less than or equal to the d90 value.
 2. The electrolyte capacitor according to claim 1, wherein the electrolyte capacitor has a specific charge of from 500 to 500,000 μC/g, based on the weight of the electrode body covered with a dielectric.
 3. An electronic circuit which comprises the electrolyte capacitor as claimed in claim
 2. 4. The electrolyte capacitor according to claim 2, wherein dispersions A) of which the films in the dried state have a specific conductivity of greater than 200 S/cm.
 5. The electrolyte capacitor according to claim 4, wherein the particles B) of the electrically conductive polymer in the dispersion A) comprise at least one polythiophene, polypyrrole or polyaniline, which are optionally substituted.
 6. The electrolyte capacitor according to claim 5, wherein the viscosity of dispersion A) can be between 3 and 50 mPas (measured at 20° C. and a shear rate of 100 s⁻¹).
 7. An electronic circuit which comprises the electrolyte capacitor as claimed in claim
 1. 8. The electrolyte capacitor according to claim 1, wherein dispersions A) of which the films in the dried state have a specific conductivity of greater than 20 S/cm.
 9. The electrolyte capacitor according to claim 1, wherein dispersions A) of which the films in the dried state have a specific conductivity of greater than 100 S/cm.
 10. The electrolyte capacitor according to claim 1, wherein dispersions A) of which the films in the dried state have a specific conductivity of greater than 200 S/cm.
 11. The electrolyte capacitor according to claim 1, wherein the particles B) of the electrically conductive polymer in the dispersion A) comprise at least one polythiophene, polypyrrole or polyaniline, which are optionally substituted.
 12. The electrolyte capacitor according to claim 10, wherein the particles B) of the electrically conductive polymer in the dispersion A) comprise at least one polythiophene, polypyrrole or polyaniline, which are optionally substituted.
 13. The electrolyte capacitor according to claim 1, wherein the viscosity of dispersion A) can be between 0.1 and 500 mPas (measured at 20° C. and a shear rate of 100 s⁻¹).
 14. The electrolyte capacitor according to claim 1, wherein the viscosity of dispersion A) can be between 1 and 200 mPas (measured at 20° C. and a shear rate of 100 s⁻¹).
 15. The electrolyte capacitor according to claim 1, wherein the viscosity of dispersion A) can be between 1 and 100 mPas (measured at 20° C. and a shear rate of 100 s⁻¹).
 16. The electrolyte capacitor according to claim 1, wherein the viscosity of dispersion A) can be between 3 and 50 mPas (measured at 20° C. and a shear rate of 100 s⁻¹).
 17. The electrolyte capacitor according to claim 1, wherein the formation of a solid electrolyte which completely covers the dielectric surface.
 18. The electrolyte capacitor according to claim 1, wherein the formation of a solid electrolyte which partly covers the dielectric surface. 